Here’s my process:
1. Get an idea.
Sometimes it’s a broad idea, like I want to write about hurricanes. But
usually, it’s more specific and conceptual, like I want to explore the
interrelationships of living things using a cocoa tree as the hook.
2. I do some research to
see if my idea is viable and to make sure another author hasn’t already done a
brilliant book on the topic.
3. I dive in.
4. After I have a solid
body of research, I take out my toolbox and start tinkering. I think of my
tools as the items on an a la carte menu. I choose each one separately, but
with the goal of combining them to create a delicious, nutritious, and
satisfying meal.
Here’s a recap of the items on my menu:
Categories: survey, specialized,
concept, biography
Style: narrative,
expository, persuasive
Structure: description, sequence/order, compare
& contrast, question & answer, cause & effect
Voice: lively, lyrical, or
somewhere in between
Point
of view:
first, second, third
It used to be that I’d just plunge into the
writing and see where it took me. I was shooting in the dark. Often, I ended up
with a big, bloody mess.
But now that I have a have a well-stocked toolbox,
it’s easier for me to imagine important elements of a manuscript in advance. (Get
ready. I’m about to mix metaphors again.) Will a survey with a compare & contrast
structure taste better with an expository style or a narrative style? Will
adding a lively voice ruin the meal?
Does this process always work? No. Sometimes I have to do some sample tasting.
And let’s face it, sometimes I still have to just plunge into the darkness. I don’t
know if I’ll like a meal until I’ve eaten half or even all of it. But having
these tools and thinking about how to mix and match them definitely helps.
I like how you lay out the tools that you choose from but know that sometime you just have to begin writing and see what happens.
ReplyDelete