Recently, I had the
great privilege and pleasure of being a guest lecturer for an online course taught
by renowned children’s book author and editor Marc Aronson for Rutgers University.
The class is called Nonfiction and Common Core, and the students are working
toward their master’s degree in library information science.
We had some great
discussions, and I probably learned more from those bright, engaged students
than they learned from me. But the absolute highlight was getting a sneak peek
into the entire curriculum, which included a lesson called “Nonfiction Taxonomy.”
Taxonomy? Hmm. Sound
a whole lot like one of my pet projects—developing a nonfiction family tree, doesn’t it? So I plunged into that lesson
craving insight.
It turns out that
Marc and his Uncommon Corps
colleagues have developed a brand new, totally amazing system for classifying
children’s nonfiction. It’s basically accomplishes what I had in mind with my nonfiction family tree, but the
Uncommon Corp is light years ahead of my feeble attempt to get a handle on the
broad range of nonfiction currently being published for young readers.
The Uncommon Corps has come up with seven broad
categories for classifying nonfiction for children and they have graciously given me permission to share it here.
Data: In more friendly terms, you might call this category
Fasts Facts. It includes Eyewitness Books, The
Guinness Book of World Records, and my own book Animal Grossapedia. These are the concise, fact-filled books that groups
of boys love to read together and discuss.
Expository: You might call this category Facts Plus because the
facts are interwoven into a content-area explanation. This is could be
considered “traditional” nonfiction in some ways, but there's nothing old-fashioned about
today’s expository titles. Their engaging text and rich, dynamic art and design
are sure to delight as well as inform young readers.
Narrative: This is a category we’ve heard a lot (I mean
A LOT) about in the last few years. It’s the current darling of awards
committees. Narrative titles present facts in the form of a true story with a narrative
arc.
As you learn about the next few categories, I think you’ll see that some of the books
that have been lumped into the narrative category should really be thought about on their own terms, based on the author's approach to the information.
Disciplinary Thinking: These books reveal how scientists and
historians go about their work, how they evaluate evidence and form theories. The structure could be narrative, but it usually isn't. This
category might also be called something like Experts at Work. Scientists in the
Field books are the perfect example, but there are plenty of other examples. Skull by Mark Aronson is one that immediately comes to mind.
Inquiry: This category could also be called Ask and
Answer. In these books, the author raises a question or a group of related questions
and then seeks the answer. Sally Walker’s Written
in Bone and What Bluebirds Do by Pamela F. Kirby are great examples.
Interpretation: For these books, authors research a topic widely,
find their own meaning in the information, and present the content from that point
of view. Charles and Emma by Deborah
Heiligman is the first title that leaps to mind, but I’d also put books like Those Rebels, Tom and John by Barbara
Kerley in this category. I think we’ll see more of these books in the future
because this type of presentation directly supports Common Core.
Action: This is category offers a separate
spot for titles that invite young readers to take action. The most obvious
examples include Citizen Scientists by Loree Griffin Burns and the Science Play series by Vicki Cobb.
This post is getting
long, so I’m going to look more closely at each of these categories in the next
few weeks. But before I go, I wanted to show you how I would place these seven
categories on my brand-spanking-new nonfiction family tree.
The branching is
based on commonalities I see between the various kinds of books and how they may
have evolved in reaction to advances in technology and market
conditions. As always, my tree is a work in progress, but I’m feeling better
about it all the time.